United States · Federal contract register · Supplier record

COUNTY OF JACKSON

Line: Professional, physical security and badging (R430)Register loaded to September 2026Compiled 7 October 2026

COUNTY OF JACKSON — United States · Federal contract register · Supplier record: 4 contracts, all years ($137,929 · May 2016 – Apr 2025); $32.7K since January 2024 (1 contract · 1 agency); — rank in the line (of 292 suppliers · 0.0%); 24 agencies never served ($481M on the line without COUNTY OF JACKSON).

Assay record ASY-US-17PVKS60Q9 · Cite as: Assay Systems, “COUNTY OF JACKSON in the USAspending register”, https://assay-systems.com/register/us/county-of-jackson/

4
contracts, all years
$137,929 · May 2016 – Apr 2025
$32.7K
since January 2024
1 contract · 1 agency
—
rank in the line
of 292 suppliers · 0.0%
24
agencies never served
$481M on the line without COUNTY OF JACKSON

Own record by year

2019 onward
$31.3K
$35.9K
$32.7K
20192020202120222023202420252026

Who buys from COUNTY OF JACKSON

since January 2024
1agencies
$32.7Kpaid
100.0%top buyer
Department of Defense100.0%
$32,704

The line

since January 2024
$724Mline value
621contracts
25agencies
292suppliers
41.3%held by top ten

Professional, physical security and badging (R430)

$327M
$261M
$135M
202420252026Jan–Sep
—of 292 suppliers
$0COUNTY OF JACKSON in the line
0.0%share of the line

Agencies that buy the line and never bought from COUNTY OF JACKSON

24agencies
425contracts
$480,992,015since January 2024
Department of Health and Human Services19 contracts
$108,760,262
Department of Homeland Security61 contracts
$56,867,331
Department of Agriculture90 contracts
$43,187,009
Department of State64 contracts
$42,030,811
Department of Energy4 contracts
$36,210,311
Department of Veterans Affairs62 contracts
$34,662,251
Department of Justice8 contracts
$30,759,828
Department of Commerce9 contracts
$25,209,917
Environmental Protection Agency5 contracts
$22,120,975
Department of Labor4 contracts
$21,221,073
Government Accountability Office1 contract
$16,071,185
Department of the Treasury11 contracts
$11,688,083
General Services Administration5 contracts
$8,847,925
Department of the Interior60 contracts
$7,083,282
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau2 contracts
$5,484,394
U.S. Agency for Global Media6 contracts
$5,123,692
Commodity Futures Trading Commission2 contracts
$1,315,914
Department of Transportation3 contracts
$1,131,324
Executive Office of the President1 contract
$993,299
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission1 contract
$877,810
National Gallery of Art1 contract
$801,079
Federal Election Commission1 contract
$263,602
National Archives and Records Administration2 contracts
$159,389
National Transportation Safety Board3 contracts
$121,269

How the line is bought

by value, since 2024
29%no competition
17%one applicant
0of these to COUNTY OF JACKSON
Competed, several suppliers applied220 contracts
$389,530,767 · 53.8%
Awarded directly, no competition314 contracts
$208,489,432 · 28.8%
Competed, one supplier applied87 contracts
$125,526,290 · 17.3%

Contracts reaching their end dates

Oct 2026 – October 2027
193contracts
$377,344,948end by October 2027
25end in April 2027 · $8.1M
124in agencies never served · $272M
$19.6M
$8.9M
$71.4M
$15.0M
$45.0M
$56.5M
$8.1M
$42.8M
$15.3M
$41.8M
$20.9M
$12.8M
$19.3M
Oct 2613 contractsNov 268 contractsDec 2615 contractsJan 276 contractsFeb 2717 contractsMar 2725 contractsApr 2725 contractsMay 2724 contractsJun 2716 contractsJul 279 contractsAug 2710 contractsSep 2723 contractsOct 272 contracts

Fastest-growing supplier in the line

same line
+699%growth

Supplier UEI QEMLRQA7PLG4

2024 to date
$73,330,235
2022–2023
$9,175,429

The extract

Every buying office, every contract holder, value, number and end date behind the figures above.

Request extractSee a sample extract

Source: USAspending.gov, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, usaspending.gov, accessed 30 September 2026.The data is available to copy, adapt, redistribute, or otherwise use for non-commercial or for commercial purposes (USAspending.gov, Licensing); no Dun & Bradstreet data is shown.