RETROTEL, INC. — United States · Federal contract register · Supplier record: 210 contracts, all years ($2,665,561 · Sep 2006 – Nov 2025); $35.4K since January 2024 (4 contracts · 2 agencies); — rank in the line (of 256 suppliers · 0.0%); 6 agencies never served ($3.2M on the line without RETROTEL, INC.).
Assay record ASY-US-061M0GA0D5 · Cite as: Assay Systems, “RETROTEL, INC. in the USAspending register”, https://assay-systems.com/register/us/retrotel-inc/
210
contracts, all years
$2,665,561 · Sep 2006 – Nov 2025
$35.4K
since January 2024
4 contracts · 2 agencies
—
rank in the line
of 256 suppliers · 0.0%
6
agencies never served
$3.2M on the line without RETROTEL, INC.
Own record by year
2019 onward
$108K
$59.0K
$39.3K
$24.0K
$20.0K
$4.5K
$30.9K
20192020202120222023202420252026
Who buys from RETROTEL, INC.
since January 2024
2agencies
$35.4Kpaid
87.3%top buyer
Department of the Treasury87.3%
$30,874
Department of Defense12.7%
$4,504
Before 2024 only: Department of Agriculture, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Justice, Department of Labor, Department of State, Department of Transportation, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of the Interior, General Services Administration, Social Security Administration.
The line
since January 2024
$61.8Mline value
752contracts
16agencies
256suppliers
62.8%held by top ten
Telephone and telegraph equipment (5805)
$16.8M
$37.7M
$7.2M
202420252026Jan–Sep
—of 256 suppliers
$0RETROTEL, INC. in the line
0.0%share of the line
Agencies that buy the line and never bought from RETROTEL, INC.
6agencies
58contracts
$3,215,836since January 2024
National Aeronautics and Space Administration50 contracts
Source: USAspending.gov, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, usaspending.gov, accessed 30 September 2026.The data is available to copy, adapt, redistribute, or otherwise use for non-commercial or for commercial purposes (USAspending.gov, Licensing); no Dun & Bradstreet data is shown.